NCAA won't go down quiet in Cole Hutson eligibility fight

By JR·2 min read
NCAA won't go down quiet in Cole Hutson eligibility fight

TLDR: A judge just handed Cole Hutson a win over the NCAA.

Cole Hutson spent 4 years grinding in the trenches at Texas, starting 23 of the 48 games he played in at guard and center. He went undrafted this spring, caught on with the Dallas Cowboys for a rookie minicamp look, and figured that was probably the end of his football story. Then he sued the NCAA.

Hutson's case, filed in Travis County, targets the NCAA's Seasons of Competition Rule under Bylaw 12.6. The association rolled out a new five-for-five eligibility model that lets players from the 2023 recruiting class and beyond play five seasons without burning a redshirt. Problem is, Hutson came in with the 2022 class, one cycle too early to get the same benefit, and his lawyers argue that cutoff is arbitrary and unfair to guys stuck on the wrong side of the line.

A Travis County judge sided with him, at least for now. According to Pete Nakos, the TRO against the NCAA was officially granted, clearing the way for Hutson to immediately resume college football activity while the case plays out.

Pete Nakos
Pete Nakos
@PeteNakos

Former Texas OL Cole Hutson's TRO against the NCAA has been granted, a source tells @On3. @BobbyBurtonOTF first. t.co/GYz7uBN9qB

The NCAA wasted zero time firing back. Hours after the ruling, the association sent On3 a statement defending the age-based model as "a clear, common-sense rule" designed to protect opportunities for future generations of athletes while keeping college sports actually populated by college students. The NCAA made clear it plans to fight this in court, not fold.

Pete Nakos
Pete Nakos
@PeteNakos

Statement from NCAA to @On3 on Hutson ruling: “The new age-based eligibility model is a clear, common-sense rule that will protect opportunities for future generations of students to access the life-changing benefits of college sports participation, while also ensuring college sports are played by college students. We intend to defend the rules made by NCAA members exercising their collective judgement about what is best for college sports. Continued attempts by some to get more than the rules provided makes clear that working with Congress is the only way to bring stability to college sports.”

Buried in that statement is the real headline: the NCAA is pointing straight at Congress. "Continued attempts by some to get more than the rules provided makes clear that working with Congress is the only way to bring stability to college sports," the association said. That's not just legal posturing about one lineman from Austin, it's the NCAA admitting, again, that it can't win the eligibility wars case-by-case and needs federal legislation to stop the bleeding.

Hutson's TRO is just the opening round. A preliminary injunction hearing is next, and that ruling will decide whether he actually gets to suit up for the 2026 season or whether this was a brief, temporary reprieve. Either way, expect more of these lawsuits. Every eligibility rule the NCAA writes seems to create a new plaintiff with a Travis County zip code and a lawyer on retainer.