The NCAA eligibility ruling that has everyone panicking

By JR·2 min read
The NCAA eligibility ruling that has everyone panicking

TLDR: A federal judge just handed the NCAA a legal beatdown, and Barstool is already picturing 30-year-old running backs.

U.S. District Judge Charlotte Sweeney in Denver granted a class-wide preliminary injunction ordering the NCAA to create a blanket waiver giving every Class of 2022 athlete a 5th season of eligibility for 2026-27. That's not a one-off exception for some kid with a sympathetic story — it covers every Division I player who started their college career in the 2022-23 season, full stop.

The ruling torches the NCAA's own plan for handling this. The association's so-called 'five-for-five' rule was supposed to kick in gradually, starting with athletes who enroll in fall 2027. Sweeney's order basically skips the line and forces the NCAA to extend that grace to a class of players it never intended to cover, all at once, months before the season starts.

Barstool Sports
Barstool Sports
@barstoolsports

BFW is worried that this new ruling could be a slippery slope and allow college athletes to play in college indefinitely

That's the exact worry BFW raised on the show — if a judge can order the NCAA to just create eligibility out of thin air for an entire graduating class, what's stopping the next lawsuit from doing the same thing for the Class of 2023, or 2024? The NCAA has spent the last few years getting run over in court on NIL, transfers and now eligibility, and each loss makes the next lawsuit look more winnable.

Worth noting: the ruling isn't quite the loophole to eternal college football it sounds like. After the NCAA asked for clarification, Sweeney confirmed her order stands but has no impact on other existing rules — including the one barring athletes who sign pro contracts from coming back to college. So this is about extending eligibility for guys who were already in the system, not creating a path for pros to un-retire into a Big 12 backfield.

Cons
Cons
@CaptainCons

be it Dave or someone else, I do think college sports would benefit from some sort of governing body because clearly the NCAA has lost the plot

Cons' point cuts right at the bigger issue here — the NCAA doesn't look like an organization steering the ship anymore, it looks like one getting steered by whichever courtroom it loses in next. The association already said it intends to appeal Sweeney's ruling, so this is far from settled, but for now every Class of 2022 player gets to plan a season nobody expected them to have.

College football rosters this fall are going to look weird either way. Programs now have to figure out how to budget scholarships and NIL money for a wave of 5th-year seniors nobody planned for, on top of the transfer portal chaos that's already reshaping every roster in the country every offseason. The appeal is the next thing to watch, but until a higher court says otherwise, the Class of 2022 just got its season back.